![]() It was met with disdain from many artists and art critics of the time, who called it ABC Art or No-Art Nihilism due to its stark opposition to the volatile expressionism of the time. In a growing resistance to abstract expressionism, a genre filled with intense emotion and expressive feelings, the minimalism movement originated in the 1950’s in New York City, and reached its peak in the 1960’s. Minimalism doesn’t mean, however, that there is no artistic quality to a piece of work it is perhaps, “ art, for art’s sake”. monochromatism (black/white/grey) is common in this formĪlthough exhibited in many mediums, minimalism is perhaps most associated with sculpture, where both large and small pieces are viewed as “literal” and open to the viewer’s own interpretation, and where the physicality of the piece is what is truly expressed.often utilizing industrial, or nontypical, materials.few variations in color and shape, used in repetition.a variety of geometric shapes and patterns.Minimalist art is characterized by several factors: Let’s delve into what minimalist art truly is. ![]() However, there is a true “minimalism” in the art world, whose history can be traced and where outstanding examples can be seen. Many examples of art exhibiting some, if not all, of these characteristics, can be found in works exhibited in both commercial and private settings. What the world described it as devalued the form of writing, Raymond Carver, in an interview with the Paris Review, stated: ‘There’s something about ‘minimalist’ that smacks of smallness of vision and execution that I don’t like.’ Most authors did in fact feel the same way – they adhered to the principles of minimalism, without adoration for the word itself.In today’s world, the term “minimalism” could mean anything simple or lacking a lot of variation (in color, texture, images). Indeed, such is the effect of critics that authors Raymond Carver and Frederick Barthelme disapproved their works to be linked to the word ‘minimalist’ itself. The very name tells you what he thinks, comparing minimalist works to the productions of an Assembly-Line, demarcating all the minimalist works into unoriginal, superficial and uninspiring. The strongest attack yet was John Aldridge’s Talents and Technicians: Literary Chic and the New Assembly-Line Fiction. Literary minimalism, if you check the records, has been an evergreen shooting range for many critics throughout time. They will tell you that literary minimalism was not a ‘movement’, rather a style of writing that slowly paved its way into the limelight and in time became known globally at the end of the 70s. All this is done without the author withholding complete release of the tale to the readers, steering it towards the climax, thus giving it the readability and attraction needed. Any details (or filling up of details) left by the writer is the responsibility of the reader. To put it blandly, minimalism in literature can be defined by some as putting words on auto-pilot, still allowing the passengers to admire the view that they themselves end up creating. Rather than describing what goes on in a character’s mind before or during a scene, the author will directly take you there and show what the character is doing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |